A study released in 2003 by the United Kingdom's Office for National Statistics concluded that the proportion of women in England and Wales marrying younger men rose from 15% to 26% between 19.The study also showed a higher divorce rate as the age difference rose when the woman was older and a lower divorce rate as the age difference rose when the man was older. In such cases it is almost never necessary to separate the items of the list with semicolons. That is a ridiculous sentence that is difficult to follow because of the lack of Oxford commas before the last two ors. ” No, that sentence is perfectly clear with Oxford commas but no semicolons: As is made clear by the Oxford commas, the only individual item in that list that contains commas is the last one.I should also note that many of these issues are more properly classified under style or usage. If that isn’t clear to you, it isn’t because you aren’t a scientific researcher and aren’t familiar with the terminology; it’s because the authors left out a necessary comma. It’s true that “if needed” could be surrounded by commas, but this is not necessary. I’d wager that few people would clearly understand this sentence on first read without the Oxford comma but that many people would (scientists, anyway) with it. I don’t know about you, but that sentence was temporarily confusing the first time I read it, and today when I browsed my ever-growing list of Oxford comma–needing sentences to find some more good ones to add to this guide, this sentence initially confused me again.
Dunn concluded that "Not once across all ages and countries ...That’s important, because the more unusual words are used, the harder the password will be to remember.For example, “decimalisation contrapuntal assizes diabolism” is not particularly easy to remember, I’d say. The rule would theoretically create a paradox for people under 14, because the younger partner would have to be older than the older partner, but 14 is about the youngest you can be and make anything even remotely resembling adultish decisions respecting relationships anyway, so this rule works out rather well. This has the advantage of allowing for a larger age gap the older the partners get; the four-year age gap between a 22-year-old and an 18-year-old is significant (and just barely allowed by this rule), but the same age gap between an 86-year-old and a 90-year-old isn't worth comment.